Shell consultant quits, accusing agency of ‘extreme harms’ to surroundings | Shell

A senior safety marketing consultant has give up working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of inflicting “excessive harms” to the environment.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for climate change risks” and urged others within the oil and gasoline business to “walk away whereas there’s still time”.

The chief, who works for the unbiased agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 staff. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she stated she had quit due to Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and fuel agency of “working past the design limits of our planetary methods” and “not placing environmental security before production”.

She mentioned: “Shell’s acknowledged security ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Goal Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable however they're utterly failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gas extraction causes excessive harms, to our climate, to the environment and to folks. And no matter they say, Shell is just not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett informed the Guardian she “couldn't marry these conflicts with my conscience”, including: “I could not carry that any longer, and I’m ready to cope with the results.”

Shell was a “main consumer” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating security procedures in high-risk industries together with oil and fuel manufacturing. She started working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the industry.

“I can not work for an organization that ignores all the alarms and dismisses the risks of local weather change and ecological collapse,” she mentioned. “Because, contrary to Shell’s public expressions round net zero, they aren't winding down on oil and gasoline, but planning to explore and extract far more.”

Dennett – a criminal justice graduate who has spent her career in research and consultancy – was impressed to cease working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Rise up local weather protesters urging the corporate’s workers to go away. The movement’s TruthTeller whistleblowing venture encourages oil and gasoline workers to walk away from the business.

The marketing consultant, who runs inner security surveys and is predicated in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to walk away and “many people working in fossil gas corporations simply aren’t so fortunate”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves if they really imagine their vision for more oil and gas extraction secures a safe future for humanity”.

In late 2020, a number of Shell executives in its clear energy sector left amid reports they had been annoyed on the pace of Shell’s shift towards greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to scale back emissions shall be mentioned at the meeting where the Dutch activist group Follow This can push for the corporate’s insurance policies to be extra per the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has advised investors to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set extra stringent local weather targets.

The Shell investor Royal London has said it intends to abstain on a vote on the agency’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief government, Ben van Beurden, might experience an investor rebellion towards his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote against it.

Sign up to the every day Business Today e mail or comply with Guardian Enterprise on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in no doubt, we're decided to ship on our international technique to be a web zero firm by 2050 and thousands of our persons are working onerous to attain this. We've set targets for the quick, medium and long run, and have each intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon power, though the world will still want oil and fuel for decades to return in sectors that can’t be easily decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to household bills after the energy trade reported bumper profits fuelled by the increase in market costs, prompting opposition events to call on the government to bring in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the largest oil and gasoline producer within the North Sea spoke out against a one-off levy, arguing it might lead to the business approving fewer initiatives.

Harbour Vitality’s chief govt, Linda Prepare dinner, told the Monetary Instances: “A better tax burden will make it tougher for new oil and fuel initiatives to meet investment hurdle charges, that means fewer tasks shall be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when business is being encouraged to increase domestic UK oil and fuel manufacturing and assist an orderly energy transition.”

Harbour has advised the government it plans to speculate $6bn in the North Sea over three years as industry makes its case against the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had acquired a £4.6m “golden good day” from the firm.