Shell consultant quits, accusing firm of ‘excessive harms’ to setting | Shell

A senior safety consultant has give up working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of causing “excessive harms” to the environment.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for climate change risks” and urged others in the oil and gasoline industry to “stroll away whereas there’s still time”.

The chief, who works for the impartial agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 staff. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she stated she had give up due to Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and gas agency of “operating past the design limits of our planetary programs” and “not placing environmental security before manufacturing”.

She said: “Shell’s acknowledged safety ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Aim Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable however they're utterly failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gasoline extraction causes extreme harms, to our climate, to our surroundings and to individuals. And whatever they are saying, Shell is just not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett informed the Guardian she “couldn't marry these conflicts with my conscience”, including: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the results.”

Shell was a “main client” of Dennett’s business, which specialises in evaluating security procedures in high-risk industries including oil and gas production. She started working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the industry.

“I can now not work for an organization that ignores all the alarms and dismisses the risks of climate change and ecological collapse,” she said. “Because, opposite to Shell’s public expressions round internet zero, they are not winding down on oil and gasoline, but planning to explore and extract much more.”

Dennett – a felony justice graduate who has spent her career in analysis and consultancy – was inspired to stop working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Insurrection local weather protesters urging the corporate’s workers to go away. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing mission encourages oil and gasoline staff to stroll away from the business.

The advisor, who runs inner safety surveys and is based in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to walk away and “many people working in fossil gasoline firms just aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they really believe their imaginative and prescient for more oil and fuel extraction secures a secure future for humanity”.

In late 2020, a number of Shell executives in its clean vitality sector left amid reviews they had been pissed off at the tempo of Shell’s shift towards greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to reduce emissions might be mentioned on the assembly the place the Dutch activist group Comply with This will push for the corporate’s policies to be extra according to the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has advised investors to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set extra stringent local weather targets.

The Shell investor Royal London has mentioned it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief executive, Ben van Beurden, might experience an investor riot against his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote in opposition to it.

Sign as much as the daily Business Today e-mail or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson stated: “Be in little doubt, we're determined to deliver on our global strategy to be a internet zero firm by 2050 and hundreds of our individuals are working arduous to realize this. Now we have set targets for the brief, medium and long run, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon energy, though the world will nonetheless need oil and gas for decades to come back in sectors that may’t be easily decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a possible windfall tax to fund cuts to family bills after the vitality industry reported bumper profits fuelled by the increase in market prices, prompting opposition events to call on the government to bring in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the biggest oil and gasoline producer within the North Sea spoke out in opposition to a one-off levy, arguing it would lead to the trade approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Vitality’s chief executive, Linda Cook dinner, advised the Monetary Occasions: “A higher tax burden will make it tougher for new oil and gasoline tasks to fulfill funding hurdle rates, meaning fewer projects will be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when industry is being inspired to increase home UK oil and gas manufacturing and assist an orderly power transition.”

Harbour has advised the government it plans to take a position $6bn in the North Sea over three years as industry makes its case towards the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had acquired a £4.6m “golden hey” from the agency.